Dr. Chika Ezeanya Esiobu will speak in the GLF Africa 2022 digital conference on 15 September 2022. Get your ticket here.
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “sovereignty” in three ways: supreme power especially over a body politic, freedom from external control and controlling influence. But is not therein a bit of a paradox – who or what is sovereign over the word’s very meaning?
As we hear here from Chika Ezeanya Esiobu, a prolific writer, researcher, teacher and public intellectual, sovereignty has been an amorphous force throughout African history, taken from and held onto by the continent at different times and in different ways. Now, its diversity of meanings at the personal, communal, national and regional levels are constantly pushing and pulling one another, while continued infiltration from outside powers makes it even more difficult for the continent to realize its reign supreme.
Nevertheless, Esiobu says there’s one thing that could help bring unity to Africa’s sovereignty – while inherently upholding its many interpretations. Perhaps it’s this very paradox in which Africa’s sovereignty lies.
Sovereignty implies authority that is focused on organizing community around common aspirations, to achieve set goals.
Sovereignty in traditional Igbo culture lies with the community, however, the individual – both male and female – is empowered to play a key role as a member of community.
As an African who grew up aware of both traditional institutions and the more formal government structure, I had a double consciousness of sovereignty.
At the traditional level, the male head of the family wielded authority over decisions in the home, as well as represented the family in the community. The extended family played a key role in decision-making that impacted all families. The extended family has the male group (Umunna) and the female group (Umuada), and both wielded power over traditionally set jurisdictions.
I was also aware of the traditional head of my community, who more or less represented my village and worked with the different extended families to ensure advancement and growth. Yet, growing up mostly under military rule in my country, I was aware that decisions over key matters that affected my family and community lied with the government. These included matters of education, commerce, security, state politics and others.
The implication of what constitutes sovereignty across much of Africa, especially south of the Sahara, has changed tremendously over the years. Sovereignty has transformed across stages, spanning the time when traditional institutions or acephalous societies reigned supreme, to when colonialism imposed European sovereignty on parts of the region. The transformation of the sovereign across Africa continued with the transfer of political power from the former colonial authorities to African-led governments, which was an exercise that ensured that sovereignty was still covertly exercised by the former imperialists, through exercising control over the means of production, education and commerce, technology and even the arts.
Much of the formerly colonized countries were unable to even grasp the extent of control still wielded by the former colonial authorities until very recently. Despite the deep-rooted and ongoing assault on the sovereignty of many countries in Africa, still, across the region, traditional forms of sovereignty have endured in different dimensions and remain relevant in grassroots mobilization.
The continent of Africa has no sovereignty over any sector. However, individual African countries wield territorial sovereignty over their allocated land mass. The African Union is a union of African states with the long-term aim of yielding part of state sovereignty to the regional bloc. That vision is yet to be actualized.
That said, Africa is a continent, and realities across the region can only be analyzed on a country-by-country basis and not on the continent as a whole. Many African countries are still very much controlled by the former colonial authorities. Others are much indebted to China and the Bretton Woods system, and these control decisions and outcomes in the territories to an extent.
Intellectual sovereignty is foundational to societal advancement. In the field of education, which is considered to be the mother of all disciplines, I hope to see an Africa that is fiercely introspective as far as knowledge generation is concerned. Africa’s Indigenous knowledge will have to be at the core of the continent’s research and development across disciplines and sectors. Mainstreamed Indigenous knowledge will strengthen all segments of society, especially the seat of sovereignty – the political sector – where the current governance structures are mostly too expensive, alien to the realities of the region and therefore unsustainable.
The Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) is the world’s largest knowledge-led platform on integrated land use, dedicated to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and Paris Climate Agreement. The Forum takes a holistic approach to create sustainable landscapes that are productive, prosperous, equitable and resilient and considers five cohesive themes of food and livelihoods, landscape restoration, rights, finance and measuring progress. It is led by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), in collaboration with its co-founders UNEP and the World Bank and Charter Members. Charter members: CIAT, CIFOR-ICRAF, CIRAD, Climate Focus, Conservation International, Crop Trust, Ecoagriculture Partners, The European Forest Institute, Evergreen Agriculture, FAO, FSC, GEF, GIZ, ICIMOD, IFOAM – Organics International, The International Livestock Research Institute, INBAR, IPMG, IUFRO, Rainforest Alliance, Rare, Rights and Resources Initiative, SAN, TMG-Think Tank for Sustainability, UNCCD, UNEP, Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation part of Wageningen Research, World Farmer Organization, World Bank Group, World Resources Institute, WWF International, Youth in Landscapes Initiative (YIL)
